Channel extractor en cool edit pro 2.0 full#
Channel extractor en cool edit pro 2.0 windows 10#

It seems to have something to do with the temp files Cool Edit creates but I haven't found a solution. Since installing it on Win 10 I frequently encounter 'lags, short lock ups' when processing files especially if it's a long file such as recording an entire side of a vinyl LP. I've had no trouble with all the windows upgrades and even used it with Vista on an old slow laptop. I've been using Cool Edit for so long I can't remember what I was on but pretty sure it was XP.

Channel extractor en cool edit pro 2.0 windows 10#

I too am still using (and prefer Cool Edit 2000) and on a Windows 10 PC. a desynchronized video audio stream: in multitrack view / timeline. while 'Cool Edit Pro' is quite 'talented' вЂ“ usually not too much pain (if not among the best, on that point) вЂ“ when it comes to resync. wav in 'Audacity', to recode the stream to '5.1. aac' format: a little frustrating, knowing that its multichannel encoder works OK. 'Audacity', another feature 'Cool Edit Pro' misses is the ability to save to '5.1. Though a very good (free) tool, 'Audacity' being less intuitive, after recording, I switch back to 'Cool Edit Pro' to edit the results (saved to uncompressed 'PCM Wave', of course). BUT: since 'Windows' sound settings become TEDIOUS!, in that particular case, I rather use 'Audacity' (2.1.2.), as it ships with an interesting feature, named 'Windows WASAPI' - which solves the problem in a snap. Thanks to 'Virtual Cable' it worked: at last.

Channel extractor en cool edit pro 2.0 full#

I had to use 'Virtual Cable' (freeware) and such tools - since 'Dell' has disabled THAT (one or precise) kind of full duplex recording. One вЂ“ nasty вЂ“ problem, though: trying to 'record-what-your-hear (= speakers sound)' with 'Cool Edit Pro', using certain 'Dell' PCs & some other brands, turns out to be a nightmare. But the efficiency + EASE of use of 'Cool Edit Pro' are still hard to beat. Therefore, I stick to 'Cool Edit Pro 2.1', to waste less time вЂ“ though I understand that some users care about 'Audition' more advanced features. The same applies to 'Cool Edit 2000': tested OK.ДЄbout 'Adobe Audition': I tested that one (a few versions, years ago, now) and encountered several soundboards &/or sound modules compatibility problems.

10' (quite a bloat.).ДЄlso, to avoid installing 'Cool Edit Pro 2.1' every once in a while in a 'new' machine (whatever its age ), I easily / successfully converted it to a portable editor, using 'Cameyo' (freeware version). So, for the sake of efficiency, I still use the old 'Windows XP' вЂ“ and, when a modern 'Windows' is required: 'Win. I installed both 'Cool Edit Pro 2.1' and 'Cool Edit 2000' вЂ“ in a 'Windows 10' * 64-bit PC (aging, though: 2006!.) + a 'Windows 10' 32-bit one: with no problem at all.